Which of the following indicates poor quality assurance in the NAMP?

In the context of the Navy Naval Aviation Maintenance Program, an increase in mishap rates is a significant indicator of poor quality assurance. Mishaps in aviation may result from inadequate maintenance, improper procedures, or insufficient training, all of which reflect deficiencies in quality assurance practices. Quality assurance is critical in ensuring that all maintenance actions are performed correctly, safely, and efficiently, thereby reducing the likelihood of accidents.

When mishap rates rise, it indicates that the processes meant to ensure safety and reliability are failing or not being properly implemented. This can lead to serious consequences, not just in terms of equipment and operational readiness, but also in risk to personnel and negative impacts on mission capability. Therefore, a high mishap rate directly correlates with shortcomings in quality assurance within the NAMP.

In contrast, increased maintenance costs and increased downtime of aircraft could be tied to various operational factors and do not necessarily indicate poor quality assurance by themselves. Increased compliance with safety regulations suggests a proactive approach to safety management rather than a deficiency in quality assurance.